View Cart
For more information
Call 1-800-351-0222



Philosophical discussion of the death-penalty. History of state-sanctioned death penalty for certain crimes. Ethical, religious and philosophical thought regarding capital punishment. Views for and against. Civil and moral legislation. State theory of various Western philosophers. Controversy surrounding the death penalty in the U.S. Racism. Whether capital punishment acts as a deterrent against crime.
Citations 52
Citation Style APA
Sources 24
Pages 20
Price: $80.00
From the Paper
This research examines the subject of capital punishment from a philosophical perspective. The research will set forth the historical context in which death-penalty philosophy emerged as a significant issue of social and civic discourse and then discuss prevailing philosophical and religious views of capital punishment, both for and against, with particular emphasis on philosophical views. Whether capital punishment acts a deterrent for the commission of crimes in general will also be discussed.
The practice of capital punishment, or a state-sanctioned death penalty for certain crimes, appears to be as ancient as history. The Code of Hammurabi, discovered only in AD 1902 but estimated to have been promulgated between 2100 and 1700 BC, was the first systematic attempt to foster disinterested, impartial state

Also Search for CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. in all categories

Related Essays

  • Capital Punishament
    An examination of capital punishment policy in the United States of America with emphasis given to the sociological arguments for and against. Capital punishment as proportionate justice, and a divisive issue in the United States.
    Brief history; pros & cons; Supreme Court findings.
    Explores pros & cons, rationality & morality of death penalty.
    Argues against use of the death penalty as ineffective punishment. Claims it is not fairly administered, does not deter people from committing murder, does not effect the conscience of children, and is the most costly way of dealing with criminal offenders. Gives pros and cons of the death penalty, arguments and counter-arguments.
    On moral, legal, deterrent, statistical, humane, economic grounds.
  • Philosophy
    This paper provides a discussion of Immanuel Kant’s moral philosophy as it relates to his purely retributive view of capital punishment. The discussion argues that Kant’s eye-for-an-eye view of capital punishment for murderers seems to undermine his primary principle that it is always wrong to use another individual as a means for an end.
  • Juvenile Capital Punishment
    This paper provides an argumentative essay that argues for prohibition on the imposition of the death penalty for juvenile offenders. Arguments include a lack of neurological and psychological development among adolescents, the lack of deterrence from use of the death penalty, and bias in applying the death penalty.
  • “An Eye for an Eye” Is Still Valid
    Some reasons why the writer supports the death penalty, and some citations which prove that capital punishment canm indeed be a deterrent
  • Capital Punishment as a Deterrent
    Reviews three postions on the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent to the commission of capital crimes. Concludes that there is a deterrent effect.
    Examines race as major factor in murder & in imbalance of death penalty application.

Related Pages


Become a Premium Member. Buy all pre-written essays for only $2 per page! AND Get $1 of store credit for every $10 you spend!


Show all subjects...